Comments for Jiří {x2} Činčura http://blog.cincura.net Taking something that can't be done, and then doing it. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on log4net (back) alive on NuGet by Jay Ragsdale http://blog.cincura.net/232619-log4net-back-alive-on-nuget/#comment-7313 Jay Ragsdale Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:30 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232619#comment-7313 Here's a good write-up on how to work around the new signature: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/kozmic/~3/2Gc82u7D6rI/ Here’s a good write-up on how to work around the new signature:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/kozmic/~3/2Gc82u7D6rI/

]]> Comment on InfoQ interview with me by Mariuz http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/#comment-7217 Mariuz Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:26:57 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232715#comment-7217 I have copy pasted the text here from google cache http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6736 I hope microsoft wasn't too afraid about your comment about the SQL Compact ... and retracted the article I have copy pasted the text here from google cache

http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6736

I hope microsoft wasn’t too afraid about your comment about the SQL Compact … and retracted the article

]]> Comment on InfoQ interview with me by Firebird News » InfoQ: Q&A with Jiri Cincura of the Firebird Database Project about the ADO.NET provider , ORM ,EF … http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/#comment-7216 Firebird News » InfoQ: Q&A with Jiri Cincura of the Firebird Database Project about the ADO.NET provider , ORM ,EF … Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:11:49 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232715#comment-7216 [...] The article seems to be retracted for the moment , Don’t panic we asked why and investigate the cause (see the comments section) [...] [...] The article seems to be retracted for the moment , Don’t panic we asked why and investigate the cause (see the comments section) [...]

]]> Comment on Firebird and MS Sync Framework by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/228291-firebird-and-ms-sync-framework/#comment-7160 cincura.net Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:42:01 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/228291-firebird-and-ms-sync-framework/#comment-7160 What exactly you'd like to know related to Firebird there? What exactly you’d like to know related to Firebird there?

]]> Comment on InfoQ interview with me by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/#comment-7159 cincura.net Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:41:17 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232715#comment-7159 Weird, even the search there gives this broken address. I asked InfoQ team to check it. Weird, even the search there gives this broken address. I asked InfoQ team to check it.

]]> Comment on Firebird and MS Sync Framework by abuzer http://blog.cincura.net/228291-firebird-and-ms-sync-framework/#comment-7158 abuzer Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:20:37 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/228291-firebird-and-ms-sync-framework/#comment-7158 Poor explanation. Does not explain what is what. Poor explanation. Does not explain what is what.

]]> Comment on InfoQ interview with me by Mariuz http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/#comment-7157 Mariuz Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:39:50 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232715#comment-7157 Where is the article ? , seems to disappeared Where is the article ? , seems to disappeared

]]> Comment on Entity Framework and Firebird (Part 2) by Yann http://blog.cincura.net/227282-entity-framework-and-firebird-part-2/#comment-7153 Yann Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:43:02 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/227282-entity-framework-and-firebird-part-2/#comment-7153 I found the problem. The feature "POSITION" was added in FireBird 2.1. So I have to migrate :-( .. Anyway. Thank you yann I found the problem. The feature “POSITION” was added in FireBird 2.1. So I have to migrate :-( .. Anyway.

Thank you

yann

]]> Comment on Entity Framework and Firebird (Part 2) by Yann http://blog.cincura.net/227282-entity-framework-and-firebird-part-2/#comment-7152 Yann Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:04:05 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/227282-entity-framework-and-firebird-part-2/#comment-7152 Hi JIŘÍ, I have tried to import a Firebird (Version 2.0) database in Visual Studio 2010 Sp1 with "database first" approach. I always get the following error: Unable to generate the model because of the following exception: 'An error occurred while executing the command definition. See the inner exception for details. Dynamic SQL Error SQL error code = -104 Token unknown - line 50, column 14 POSITION Dynamic SQL Error SQL error code = -104 Token unknown - line 50, column 14 POSITION '. Even if I take only a single Table. What can I do? Best regards yann Hi JIŘÍ,
I have tried to import a Firebird (Version 2.0) database in Visual Studio 2010 Sp1 with “database first” approach. I always get the following error:

Unable to generate the model because of the following exception: ‘An error occurred while executing the command definition. See the inner exception for details.
Dynamic SQL Error
SQL error code = -104
Token unknown – line 50, column 14
POSITION
Dynamic SQL Error
SQL error code = -104
Token unknown – line 50, column 14
POSITION
‘.
Even if I take only a single Table.

What can I do?

Best regards
yann

]]> Comment on Try catch return bool by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comment-7138 cincura.net Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:31:30 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693#comment-7138 @Douglas That's nice too. @Douglas That’s nice too.

]]> Comment on Try catch return bool by Douglas http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comment-7127 Douglas Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:27:49 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693#comment-7127 This is my gut reaction: http://pastebin.com/4VCtpFja I've moved the return true to the end, making the catch block an early exit. Has the benefit that the returns follow each other, and the useful method call gets its own block. This is my gut reaction: http://pastebin.com/4VCtpFja

I’ve moved the return true to the end, making the catch block an early exit. Has the benefit that the returns follow each other, and the useful method call gets its own block.

]]> Comment on Try catch return bool by SVNTag missing http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comment-7124 SVNTag missing Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:26:09 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693#comment-7124 I use version 3 I use version 3

]]> Comment on Try catch return bool by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comment-7123 cincura.net Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:59 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693#comment-7123 Yes, sometimes the API isn't clean. But you can do nothing about it. Yes, sometimes the API isn’t clean. But you can do nothing about it.

]]> Comment on Try catch return bool by Daniel Steigerwald http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comment-7122 Daniel Steigerwald Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:49:43 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693#comment-7122 Everything is wrong. You should not use exceptions for control flow simply because it is bad design. It doesn't make sense. Everything is wrong. You should not use exceptions for control flow simply because it is bad design. It doesn’t make sense.

]]> Comment on Managing TortoiseSVN commit and update from command line and creating PowerShell alias by Per http://blog.cincura.net/231239-managing-tortoisesvn-commit-and-update-from-command-line-and-creating-powershell-alias/#comment-7051 Per Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:36:42 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=231239#comment-7051 Thanks, just what I'm been looking for, using it already Thanks, just what I’m been looking for, using it already

]]> Comment on Pravopis – Permanentka vs. pernamentka by Mira http://blog.cincura.net/232075-pravopis-permanentka-vs-pernamentka/#comment-7050 Mira Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:51:01 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232075#comment-7050 Zapracuji na tom, ale slovo pernamentka je prostě hezčí :) Zapracuji na tom, ale slovo pernamentka je prostě hezčí :)

]]> Comment on Entity Framework 5.0! by Guest http://blog.cincura.net/232675-entity-framework-5-0-2/#comment-7034 Guest Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:37:07 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232675#comment-7034 Hmm.... .NET 4.5 can be called 4.5 because it is an 'in-place' upgrade of .NET 4.0, so there should be no 'breaking changes', so ...... ??? Hmm…. .NET 4.5 can be called 4.5 because it is an ‘in-place’ upgrade of .NET 4.0, so there should be no ‘breaking changes’, so …… ???

]]> Comment on Entity Framework 5.0??? by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/232666-entity-framework-5-0/#comment-7032 cincura.net Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:51:32 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232666#comment-7032 Cool, I summarized it (to create more confusion, ..., kidding, hope it will be clearer) <a href="http://blog.cincura.net/id/232675/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Cool, I summarized it (to create more confusion, …, kidding, hope it will be clearer) here.

]]> Comment on Entity Framework 5.0??? by Diego Vega http://blog.cincura.net/232666-entity-framework-5-0/#comment-7027 Diego Vega Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:38:30 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232666#comment-7027 I have tried to explain thigs more here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/diego/archive/2012/01/15/why-entity-framework-vnext-will-be-ef5-and-nothing-else.aspx I have tried to explain thigs more here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/diego/archive/2012/01/15/why-entity-framework-vnext-will-be-ef5-and-nothing-else.aspx

]]> Comment on Entity Framework 5.0??? by cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/232666-entity-framework-5-0/#comment-7019 cincura.net Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:53:04 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232666#comment-7019 Umm, so actually we should blame core .NET Framework team for bumping up only minor version. :) Anyway. I think this a acceptable break of rule (because core team nailed the rules) and 4.5+n is IMO more understandable than 5.0+n (that will later probably mix with .NET Framework 5.0, if there will be such version). Umm, so actually we should blame core .NET Framework team for bumping up only minor version. :) Anyway. I think this a acceptable break of rule (because core team nailed the rules) and 4.5+n is IMO more understandable than 5.0+n (that will later probably mix with .NET Framework 5.0, if there will be such version).

]]>