<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unique constraint on MS SQL?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/</link>
	<description>Taking something that can&#039;t be done, and then doing it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincura.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>Even with set ansi_nulls on; it doesn&#039;t work for me. Same error.

Looking into BOL, it doesn&#039;t say anything about the unique and nulls, only the nulls comparison in queries etc. (although it&#039;s related).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with set ansi_nulls on; it doesn&#8217;t work for me. Same error.</p>
<p>Looking into BOL, it doesn&#8217;t say anything about the unique and nulls, only the nulls comparison in queries etc. (although it&#8217;s related).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmezard</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator>pmezard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2020</guid>
		<description>Start with:

&quot;&quot;&quot;
set ansi_nulls on
go
&quot;&quot;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start with:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"<br />
set ansi_nulls on<br />
go<br />
&#8220;&#8221;"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincura.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>No nemam primo specifikaci pred sebou. Ale vzhledem k tomu, jak je definovana logika na NULL hodnotach a ze se tak chova Firebird, Oracle i jsem to tak nejak ocekaval ;) a je to i reportovano, tak bych si porad dovolil tvrdit, ze unique constraint by mel povolovat vice NULL hodnot, ale pouze jednu not-NULL. Lec muzu se mylit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No nemam primo specifikaci pred sebou. Ale vzhledem k tomu, jak je definovana logika na NULL hodnotach a ze se tak chova Firebird, Oracle i jsem to tak nejak ocekaval <img src='http://blog.cincura.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  a je to i reportovano, tak bych si porad dovolil tvrdit, ze unique constraint by mel povolovat vice NULL hodnot, ale pouze jednu not-NULL. Lec muzu se mylit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Neuwirth</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Neuwirth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>Jestli se nepletu tak se takto SQL chova minimalne od verze 7. A myslim si, ze ANSI SQL to tak i definuje.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jestli se nepletu tak se takto SQL chova minimalne od verze 7. A myslim si, ze ANSI SQL to tak i definuje.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by rohant</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by rohant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by rohant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by rohant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by mssqlserver</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by mssqlserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by mssqlserver [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by mssqlserver [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Unique constraint on MS SQL?! « Jiří {x2} Činčura -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230837-unique-constraint-on-ms-sql/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Unique constraint on MS SQL?! « Jiří {x2} Činčura -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230837#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by mssqlserver. mssqlserver said: Unique constraint on MS SQL?! « Jiří {x2} Činčura http://bit.ly/2aZDRJ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by mssqlserver. mssqlserver said: Unique constraint on MS SQL?! « Jiří {x2} Činčura <a href="http://bit.ly/2aZDRJ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/2aZDRJ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
