<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FirebirdClient and InterBase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/</link>
	<description>Taking something that can&#039;t be done, and then doing it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>Sure - I agree.  But for anyone wanting to use the Firebird.NET data provider for Interbase, i guess they can try it - but of course you will not support it.

The main reason we are using it, is because of its speed.  Also its very stable, and we have not seen any stability issues with it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure &#8211; I agree.  But for anyone wanting to use the Firebird.NET data provider for Interbase, i guess they can try it &#8211; but of course you will not support it.</p>
<p>The main reason we are using it, is because of its speed.  Also its very stable, and we have not seen any stability issues with it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincura.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>Yes. But this may not be true in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. But this may not be true in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have successfully got FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient v2.5.0.0 working with Interbase 7.1 with ONLY 1 tweak.

and that is in the ServerVersion method. for Managed10 code zone.

I have not tested it with previous versions.  But i DO know that its much quicker than using the Free Interbase ODBC Driver.  And also, the Firebird Client is working like a dream with RemoteEvents.

So - as far as i can see - its actually 99%  ALL GOOD :-)

Just having a problem with using it with Interbase for Entity Framework, which im trying to resolve now.

:-)

Peace Out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have successfully got FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient v2.5.0.0 working with Interbase 7.1 with ONLY 1 tweak.</p>
<p>and that is in the ServerVersion method. for Managed10 code zone.</p>
<p>I have not tested it with previous versions.  But i DO know that its much quicker than using the Free Interbase ODBC Driver.  And also, the Firebird Client is working like a dream with RemoteEvents.</p>
<p>So &#8211; as far as i can see &#8211; its actually 99%  ALL GOOD <img src='http://blog.cincura.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just having a problem with using it with Interbase for Entity Framework, which im trying to resolve now.</p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.cincura.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peace Out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincura.net</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>The old protocol is still in FirebirdClient, but we&#039;re also using some Firebird only related commands. Hence the note about tweaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old protocol is still in FirebirdClient, but we&#8217;re also using some Firebird only related commands. Hence the note about tweaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdv</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>kdv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>Also the more detailed and simple answer is that FirebirdClient, having it&#039;s name that can be confused with fbclient.dll, does not uses fbclient.dll and conversating with the server using tcp/ip directly.
And, because Firebird has changed it&#039;s protocol between client and server, FirebirdClient is incompatible with the Interbase, while fbclient.dll is not (because fbclient.dll can support older protocols, depending on the server).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the more detailed and simple answer is that FirebirdClient, having it&#8217;s name that can be confused with fbclient.dll, does not uses fbclient.dll and conversating with the server using tcp/ip directly.<br />
And, because Firebird has changed it&#8217;s protocol between client and server, FirebirdClient is incompatible with the Interbase, while fbclient.dll is not (because fbclient.dll can support older protocols, depending on the server).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebird News &#187; FirebirdClient and InterBase &#8211; Short Answer NO is not supported</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/230835-firebirdclient-and-interbase/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebird News &#187; FirebirdClient and InterBase &#8211; Short Answer NO is not supported</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=230835#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>[...] is getting more and more support request from people who try to connect to Interbase ! with Firebird .net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is getting more and more support request from people who try to connect to Interbase ! with Firebird .net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

