Comments on: C# obsesión – how many characters you are able to put into type? :) http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/ Taking something that can't be done, and then doing it. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1590 cincura.net Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:09:36 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1590 There were good improvements to my base, but only one can be winner - the idea with "@" from pbouda. I'll try to contact you via email and find some way to give you the prize (lolipop or beer). There were good improvements to my base, but only one can be winner – the idea with “@” from pbouda. I’ll try to contact you via email and find some way to give you the prize (lolipop or beer).

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1530 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 19:49:14 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1530 <P>Nice. I didn't even know that the '@' is working here.</P> Nice. I didn’t even know that the ‘@’ is working here.

]]> By: pbouda http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1529 pbouda Mon, 11 May 2009 15:41:11 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1529 One extra character: @IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<global::System.Int32, int?>?[,]> One extra character:
@IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<global::System.Int32, int?>?[,]>

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1528 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 15:12:47 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1528 Yep, somebody can suggest this, but for me it's not a type definition (in my definition). ;)The ':' and '.' it's good, extra points added. :) Yep, somebody can suggest this, but for me it’s not a type definition (in my definition). ;) The ‘:’ and ‘.’ it’s good, extra points added. :)

]]> By: rob http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1527 rob Mon, 11 May 2009 15:04:48 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1527 I don't agree :-) But it's certainly wise choice from you, because at the moment you allow it, someone can suggest someting like#if (DEBUG && !VC_V7)So what about this:IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<global::System.Int32, int?>?[,]>There is . and : I don’t agree :-) But it’s certainly wise choice from you, because at the moment you allow it, someone can suggest someting like#if (DEBUG && !VC_V7)So what about this:IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<global::System.Int32, int?>?[,]>There is . and :

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1526 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 11:23:22 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1526 <P>The #if isn't defining the type nor it's part of type. It's conditional directive, for compiler. It's valid code, but not type (only type). </P><P><joking>And I'll be choosing the winner, hence I say no. :D</joking></P> The #if isn’t defining the type nor it’s part of type. It’s conditional directive, for compiler. It’s valid code, but not type (only type).

<joking>And I’ll be choosing the winner, hence I say no. :D </joking>

]]> By: rob http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1525 rob Mon, 11 May 2009 11:14:15 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1525 Using #if in type definition is definitely valid.The rest is question of interpretation. If you look on given compilation result then type definition is unconditional (it doesn't contains #). But if you look on C# source then definition of type is conditional and contains # character.According to rules you presented in this blog I assume that source definition is important. Using #if in type definition is definitely valid.The rest is question of interpretation. If you look on given compilation result then type definition is unconditional (it doesn’t contains #). But if you look on C# source then definition of type is conditional and contains # character.According to rules you presented in this blog I assume that source definition is important.

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1524 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 10:34:24 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1524 <P>Yes. But the '#' isn't valid for type (at least I think). I'm interested only in pure type definition characters. :)</P> Yes. But the ‘#’ isn’t valid for type (at least I think). I’m interested only in pure type definition characters. :)

]]> By: rob http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1523 rob Mon, 11 May 2009 09:55:06 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1523 # of course. Just try what I created... It works fine. I wouldn't suggest anyone to use such things, but the same is true for your type definition, isn't it? # of course. Just try what I created… It works fine. I wouldn’t suggest anyone to use such things, but the same is true for your type definition, isn’t it?

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1522 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 09:42:50 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1522 What character do you mean? The '#'? I have doubts it's allowed in type definiton. What character do you mean? The ‘#’? I have doubts it’s allowed in type definiton.

]]> By: rob http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1521 rob Mon, 11 May 2009 09:35:44 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1521 You write about C# obsession and you forget to use this most significant character :-)) IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<int, int?>?[,]>#if DEBUG []#endif myMember; You write about C# obsession and you forget to use this most significant character :-) ) IEnumerable?[,]>#if DEBUG []#endif myMember;

]]> By: cincura.net http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1520 cincura.net Mon, 11 May 2009 07:12:13 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1520 Hi Tomas,nice, but I'm afraid, this is simple repeating. :\ But you're right now on 2nd place and that's half of lolipop. :) Let's see what will others create. Hi Tomas,nice, but I’m afraid, this is simple repeating. :\ But you’re right now on 2nd place and that’s half of lolipop. :) Let’s see what will others create.

]]> By: Tomas Petricek http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesion-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1519 Tomas Petricek Sun, 10 May 2009 22:39:35 +0000 http://blog.cincura.net/230166-c-obsesi-n-how-many-characters-you-are-able-to-put-into-type/#comment-1519 Hi, here is my type. Without namespaces, it looks like this:Func<Expression<Func<Customer,bool>>,Expression<Func<Customer,bool>>,Expression<Func<Customer,bool>>>It's not something I made up right now. I've been actually using this here: http://tomasp.net/blog/dynamic-linq-queries.aspx However, you get some bonus points for using funky symbols like "?", "[,]".Did I win some prize :-)? T. Hi, here is my type. Without namespaces, it looks like this:Func>,Expression>,Expression>>It’s not something I made up right now. I’ve been actually using this here: http://tomasp.net/blog/dynamic-linq-queries.aspx However, you get some bonus points for using funky symbols like “?”, “[,]“.Did I win some prize :-) ? T.

]]>